America’s Silent Killing Fields

America’s silent killers are deadly, and do not discriminate. They target babies, the elderly, teenagers, young adults, middle-age housewives, and businessmen alike. They poison livestock, pets, and wildlife, and the people behind them deny complicity in the carnage. Who or what are these silent, deadly killers? They are the beautiful, green, uniform, and seemingly beneficial, killing fields of genetically modified (GMO) crops. The people behind them are the U.S. government, the Rockefellers, Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, and Syngenta.

How it Began

Eugenics is a dirty word, yet particularly applicable to America’s killing fields and their inception: Henry Kissinger drafted the controversial NSSM-200 in 1974, called “the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government.”  

According to NSSM-200, elements of the implementation of population control programs could include: 

            a)      the legalization of abortion;

b)      financial incentives for countries to increase their abortion, sterilization and contraception-use rates;

c)      indoctrination of children; and

d)   mandatory population control, and coercion of other forms, such as withholding disaster and food aid unless an LDC implements population control programs

NSSM-200 also specifically declared that the United States was to cover up its population control activities and avoid charges of imperialism by inducing the United Nations and various non-governmental organizations to do its dirty work.

(Human Life International, 2008)

In 1970, Henry Kissinger said, “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.” How do you control food? By consolidating agricultural interests into what was to be termed agribusiness, creating genetically modified organisms out of heritage seeds with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, patenting the new seeds, and making sure that these new seeds are force-fed to U.S. farmers as well as the rest of the world. By holding the patents on these seeds and requiring farmers to purchase new seeds every year, the control is complete. Also, by controlling how these GMO seeds are created, other more sinister uses come to mind. But first, you must convince the world of your good intentions. This is accomplished through lies, deception, and a bit of media manipulation. By promising farmers that this technology was safe, and would result in increased yields at less cost, they were more than happy to give it a try. The fact that in most cases this claim was false had yet to be proven by the innocent farmers that believed the lie. By the time independent studies started revealing that GMO is harmful, it was too late, and the freight train called agri-business was on its way to fulfilling its purpose – to make as much money as possible by spreading GMO seeds as far as possible, and thus gaining control of the population via food.  

The U.S. Farmland Takeover

It is now 2008, and the U.S. is in the midst of a deadly trend. From time-tested agricultural processes that involve tilling the land, planting, and harvesting both produce and seed, to mass-produced, genetically engineered seed injection requiring less workers and more pesticides, agribusiness has taken hold and is strangling the country with its GMO crops and farming methods. The end-result? The family farmer is squeezed out in favor of agribusiness’ mass-production methods using genetically engineered crops grown with poisoned seeds, good for one harvest only. Here are some statistics that show how GMO crops are taking over U.S. farmland:

The adoption of HT [herbicide-tolerant] corn, which had been slower in previous years, has accelerated, reaching 52 percent of U.S. corn acreage in 2007…

Plantings of Bt [insect-resistant] corn grew from 8 percent of U.S. corn acreage in 1997 to 26 percent in 1999, then fell to 19 percent in 2000 and 2001, before climbing to 29 percent in 2003 and 49 percent in 2007… Plantings of Bt cotton expanded more rapidly, from 15 percent of U.S. cotton acreage in 1997 to 37 percent in 2001 and 59 percent in 2007.

Adoption of all GE [genetically engineered] cotton, taking into account the acreage with either or both HT and Bt traits, reached 87 percent in 2007, versus 91 percent for soybeans. In contrast, adoption of all biotech corn was 73 percent.

(USDA, 2007)

The Killing Fields go Worldwide

Not content to restrict the use of GMO to the U.S., a larger, more ambitious plan was in the making.

By Presidential Executive Order [1992], the US had defined GMO seeds as harmless and hence not needing to be regulated for health and safety.

It made sure this principle was carried over into the new WTO in the form of the WTO’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement (SPS), which stated, ‘Food standards and measures aimed at protecting people from pests or animals can potentially be used as a deliberate barrier to trade’…

Other WTO rules in the Agreement to Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) forbid member countries from using domestic standards or testing, food safety laws, product standards, calling them an ‘unfair barrier to trade.’

The impact of those two US-mandated WTO rulings meant that Washington could threaten that any government restricting import of GM plants on grounds they might pose threats to health and safety of their population, could be found to be in violation of WTO free trade rules! (Engdahl, 2006)

This resulted in a long awaited plan by the multinational GMO pushers to take over global agriculture, as represented in the following chart that outlines just how many hectares of land were devoted to GMO crops from 1996 to 2006:

GMO World Hectares

(GMO Compass, 2007)

 

Take a good look at the chart above, and let’s do the math. Keep in mind that all figures are approximate.

 

1 hectare = 2.4711 acres. In 2006, there were 102 million hectares of land on planet earth devoted to GMO crops, or 252.05 million acres. 1 square mile = 640 acres. Therefore, by 2006, there were approximately 393,828 square miles of GMO crops.

 

The earth’s total landmass is approximately 92,229,476 square miles. In 2005, Taipei Times reported that 40% of the earth’s land mass was being used for farmland. Not accounting for any increase from 2005 to 2006, the amount of land being used for farmland was, in 2006, 40% of 92,229,476 square miles, or 36,891,790 square miles, and this includes grazing land for livestock production.

According to Science Daily, “grazing occupies 26 percent of the Earth’s terrestrial surface.” 26% of earth’s total landmass of 92,229,476 square miles = 23,979,664 square miles. So, subtract that from the total amount of land being used for farmland, and we get 12,912,126 square miles of farmland devoted to raising crops.  

Of this total amount of farmland that is being used to raise crops, 393,828 square miles are devoted to GMO crop production as of 2006.  

Let’s look a bit further:  

According the chart above, in 1996, there were 1.7 hectares, or 4.2 million acres, which equates to approximately 6,563 square miles of farmland devoted to GMO crops. In 2006, there were 393,828 square miles of farmland devoted to GMO crops, which was 387,265 square miles more in 2006 than in 1996. Using a rate of increase calculation, this equates to

 

A 5900% INCREASE IN LAND DEVOTED TO GMO CROPS IN A 10-YEAR PERIOD!

 

If you think that this trend cannot continue, think again.

 

In 2007, the cultivation of genetically modified plants also increased. The area dedicated to such plants rose by 12 million hectares to reach a total of 114 million hectares. The greatest increase was shown by maize, which added 10 million hectares to its area. Genetically modified plants are commercially employed in 23 countries, twelve of which are developing nations. (GMO Compass, 2008)

 

GMO Yearly Graph

(GMO Compass, 2008)

 

It looks like the agri-giants are right on schedule, with an average yearly increase of approximately 10 million hectares of land. The increase from 2006 to 2007 was 102 to 114 hectares. At this rate, the amount of land dedicated to the growth of GM killing fields will double in another 10 years.

GMO – What Harm Can it Do?

Contrary to claims by the U.S. government and Monsanto et al, who claim that GMO crops are beneficial, independent studies have been conducted with shocking results.

 

In a 2005 report by Regnum, a Russian news agency,

 

 

On October 10, during the symposium over genetic modification, organized by the National Association for Genetic Security (NAGS), Doctor of Biology Irina Ermakova made public the results of the research led by her at the Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS). This is the first research that determined clear dependence between eating genetically modified soy and the posterity of living creatures.

 

GMO Test

 

“The morphology and biochemical structures of rats are very similar to those of humans, and this makes the results we obtained very disturbing,” said Irina Ermakova to NAGS press office. (Regnum, 2005)

 

Another glaring example is that of Syngenta and the German farmer, Gottfried Glockner of North Hessen. As William Engdahl explains in Seeds of Destruction,

 

This farmer found evidence that planting Syngenta Bt-176 genetically engineered corn to feed his cattle in 1997 had been responsible for killing off his cattle, destroying his milk production, and poisoning his farmland. Syngenta’s Bt-176 corn had been engineered to produce a toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis, which they claimed was deadly to a damaging insect, the European Corn Borer. (pg. 230)

 

Evidently, Syngenta’s GMO corn was deadly to a lot more than the corn borer.

Is Anything More Important?

To make a distinction between the health effects of GMO on animals and humans is reckless at best. If rats that eat GMO soy, and cattle that eat GMO corn have severe health effects and die, then what happens to humans that eat GMO soy and corn, drink milk from GMO-fed cows, and eat beef from GMO-fed cattle? Don’t we deserve more? If GMO killing fields are poisoning the animals whose products we consume, then they are poisoning us also.

What does it matter about the issues we fight about if we are being slaughtered slowly and silently by the foods we eat? Not only are we being killed off, but the diseases that we get because of this consumption keep the medical establishment in Ferraris and Penthouses while doctors treat the symptoms of the diseases we contract, while never addressing the cause.

Can it be Stopped?

GMO killing fields are taking over our farms and stores, as well as our very lives. These silent, deadly killers have been hiding in anonymity since “1992…when George H.W. Bush…issued an Executive Order proclaiming GMO plants such as soybeans or GMO corn to be ‘substantially equivalent’ to ordinary corn or soybeans, and, therefore, not needing any special health safety study or testing” (Engdahl, 2006). Even labeling foods containing GMO ingredients is not allowed. With the proliferation of GMO ingredients, it is no wonder that companies do not want to be responsible for labeling their products. They probably do not know if what they are getting is GMO or not! How can you label something if you do not know what it is? 

Planting individual gardens with organic seeds, then harvesting these seeds from one year to the next is one way to combat the GMO revolution. Also, local groups devoted to growing organic produce for the communities in which they live can stem the tide of personal GMO consumption one community at a time, at least for a while.

The Endgame

The U.S. government, Monsanto, Dow, Dupont, and Syngenta are not in business to keep people healthy. They are in business to make money. Unless this is understood, these corporations will continue using the public as guinea pigs for their experiments in population control, and in so doing, glean ever-increasing profits from the unsuspecting and naive. It is time to stand up and resist these giants by demanding accountability, and using what resources are left to become self-sufficient and say NO WAY to GMO! If we don’t, America’s silent killing fields will do their job, and we will no longer have a choice.

 

 

 

 

Copyright 2008, Barbara H. Peterson 

 

 

References:

 

ECO World. (2008). Earth. Retrieved from http://www.ecoworld.com/earth/ecoworld_earth_home5.cfm

 

Engdahl, F.W. (2007). Seeds of Destruction. Global Research.

Engdahl, F.W. (2006). WTO, GMO and Total Spectrum Dominance:WTO rules put free-trade of agribusiness above national health concerns. Global Research. Retrieved from http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=2202

GMO Compass. (2008). Further Increase for GM Plants: Cultivation Risen to 114 Million Hectares. Global Cultivation Areas 2007. Retrieved from http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/agri_biotechnology/gmo_planting/257.global_gm_planting_2007.html

 

GMO Compass. (2007). Transgenic Crops by Trait. GM Trait Statistics. Retrieved from

http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/agri_biotechnology/gmo_planting/145.gmo_cultivation_trait_statistics.html

Human Life International. (2008). Kissinger Report 2004. Population Control: NSSM 200 – Exposed. Retrieved from http://www.hli.org/nssm_200_exposed.html 

Regnum. (2005). Genetically modified soy affects posterity: Results of Russian scientists’ studies. Retrieved from http://www.regnum.ru/english/526651.html

 

Science Daily. (2007). Harmful Environmental Effects of Livestock Production on the Planet Increasingly Serious says Panel. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070220145244.htm

 

Taipei Times. (2005). Earth is All Out of New Farmland. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2005/12/07/2003283384

 

USDA. (2007). Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S.: Extent of Adoption. Economic Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/adoption.htm

 

GMO and Morgellons Disease

I am currently reading William Engdahl’s Seeds of Destruction, which documents the takeover of our global food chain by giant transnational agri-business concerns intent on enslaving the population through GMO technology. I am having difficulty reading this book because after a few pages, I become enraged at the colossal greed and corruption that exists in our corporate government, which has no problem murdering whole populations and eco-systems, and reducing the survivors to a life of abject misery and poverty. I find that after reading just a few pages, I have to put the book down, cool off, then pick it up again and read a few more pages before going through the cycle again. Anyway, as I was going through this cycle of reading, fuming, cooling off, then reading again, a thought occurred to me. What if the advent of Morgellons Disease has something to do with the ingestion of GMO foods? The timing seems to be rather coincidental, so I did some web research, and here is what I found. 

Morgellons Disease – What is it?

Very little can be found regarding this disease. Originally, sufferers were told that their problem was imaginary. This was of little comfort to the people who were suffering.

Morgellons Disease sufferers report strange, fiber-like material sticking out of sores or wounds that erupt on the skin. This is accompanied by painful, intense itching, that has been described as “an ever present sensation as if something is crawling under the skin” 

(http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/08/344305.shtml). 

On May 18, 2006, KGW, a local news channel reporting out of the Oregon area did this story: 

Strange sickness: Mystery disease horror story (excerpt) 

[Dr. Drottar] The disabled family practice doctor felt like bugs were crawling under her skin. “If I fully tell people what has gone on with me medically, they think they’re in the twilight zone,” said Drottar. She woke up with the feeling that fluid was flowing just below her skin. Often black or blue hair like fibers protruded from her skin, she said. “I thought I had been exposed to asbestos. I thought I was having asbestos fibers come out of my skin. I was pulling long, thin, small hair-like fibers that were extremely sharp that could literally pierce through my finger nails,” Drottar said.  

In addition to the feeling of bugs and the fibers, Drottar also suffered from severe depression, chronic fatigue and a weakened immune system. As a result, she had to give up her family practice, Drottar said.  

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_051806_news_sweeps_strange_sickness_morgellons.53b2569a.html 

Here are some pictures of Morgellons lesions:

Morgellons Lesions1
Morgellons Lesions2

 The Morgellons Research Foundation

Fibers embedded in skin removed from facial lesion of three year old boy, 60x. 

Morgellons Lesions3

morgellonsusa.com

Photo of the fibrous structures that were in the skin of a Morgellons sufferer.

Morgellons and GMO – the Link

There is relatively little information regarding research correlating Morgellons with GMO foods. This is suspicious right off the bat, because it would seem that there would be a natural curiosity regarding a link between Genetically Modified Organisms that people ingest regularly and inorganic fibers that protrude from a person’s skin. This would be right up a geneticist’s alley, and quite worthy of intensive research. So, why aren’t there a ton of published studies? Why did I have a tough time finding anything related to this? Could it be that companies such as Monsanto have enough clout to effectively squash these stories? If they have enough clout to ruin countries by deceiving impoverished farmers into purchasing patented GMO seeds, then end up forcing these poor people to purchase these seeds year after year instead of harvesting their own, then I am sure they have enough clout to ask our more than willing corporate government to manipulate the press…again.  

According to Mike Stagman, PhD, “Genetic Engineering is a nightmare technology that has already caused MANY disease epidemics — documented but unpublicized” 

(http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/08/344305.shtml). 

Well Monsanto, you let at least one study slip through. With the help of a couple of search engines, I found an article by Whitley Strieber published on October 12, 2007, titled “Skin Disease May Be Linked to GM Food,” which concludes that the fibers taken from a Morgellons sufferer contain the same substance that is “used commercially to produce genetically-modified plants.” Here is the article: 

Skin Disease May Be Linked to GM Food

12-Oct-2007 Many people—and most physicians—have written off Morgellons disease as either a hoax or hypochondria. But now there is evidence that this mysterious disease may be REAL and related to GENETICALLY MODIFIED food!

The skin of Morgellons victims oozes mysterious strands that have been identified as cellulose (which cannot be manufactured by the human body), and people have the sensation of things crawling beneath their skin. The first known case of Morgellons occurred in 2001, when Mary Leitao created a web site describing the disease, which had infected her young son. She named it Morgellons after a 17th century medical study in France that described the same symptoms.

In the Sept. 15-21 issue of New Scientist magazine, Daniel Elkan describes a patient he calls “Steve Jackson,” who “for years” has “been finding tiny blue, red and black fibers growing in intensely itchy lesions on his skin.” He quotes Jackson as saying, “The fibers are like pliable plastic and can be several millimeters long. Under the skin, some are folded in a zigzag pattern. These can be as fine as spider silk, yet strong enough to distend the skin when you pull them, as if you were pulling on a hair.”

Doctors say that this type of disease could only be caused by a parasite, but anti-parasitic medications do not help. Psychologists insist that this is a new version of the well-known syndrome known as “delusional parasitosis.” While this is a “real” disease, it is not a physically-caused one.

But now there is physical evidence that Morgellons is NOT just psychological. When pharmacologist Randy Wymore offered to study some of these fibers if people sent them to him, he discovered that “fibers from different people looked remarkably similar to each other and yet seem to match no common environmental fibers.”

When they took them to a police forensic team, they said they were not from clothing, carpets or bedding. They have no idea what they are.

Researcher Ahmed Kilani says he was able to break down two fiber samples and extract their DNA. He found that they belonged to a fungus.

An even more provocative finding is that biochemist Vitaly Citovsky discovered that the fibers contain a substance called “Agrobacterium,” which, according to New Scientist, is “used commercially to produce genetically-modified plants.” Could GM plants be “causing a new human disease?”

http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=6486

GMO – Not on My Watch!

I don’t know about you, but I am done with processed foods from the grocery store. We are being hit in our most vulnerable spot – our bellies. Most people my age have been brought up with an innate trust that what they purchase from the stores is safe to eat. This is no longer true since most processed foods contain genetically engineered ingredients. What you purchase from the corner store might just change your DNA and create such frightening symptoms that the general public simply does not believe it. What is worse is that when you go to the doctor to get help, he/she tells you what you are experiencing is all in your head. This is rubbish! It is up to people who care to make the correlations between what we eat and what happens to our bodies. Remember the old saying – “you are what you eat?” Well, I believe it is true. 

Copyright 2008, Barbara H. Peterson

The Born Again Conspiracy

prosperity-doctrine.jpg


In a previous article titled In Bed Together (1), I explained a scientific theory that espouses “out of chaos comes order,” and its possible role in the creation of the NWO. That is the scientific theory, but have you wondered why leaders claiming to be religious Christians have no problem grabbing the wealth and appear to have no regard for the abject misery caused by their single-minded pursuit of glory on the road to Armageddon? I have, and I would now like to explore the question – what does Christianity have to do with it?

First, let us postulate that most people would like to improve their circumstances, and in effect, are vying for some type of perfection in their lives. Let us also postulate that the elites that rule us are also in a quest for perfection, and since they have a whole lot of money, are in a position to do something about it in a rather big way.

The Federal Government, CIA, and the Clean Slate Theory

If we look at the CIA (2) training manuals “KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation (3),” July 1963, “Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual (4),” 1983, and the MK Ultra (5) mind control experiments from which many of the CIA’s methods were taken, we realize that in their quest for control, the ruling elites that own our Federal government and funded (6) the MK Ultra experiments, found that a clean slate is desirable from which to start re-programming the human personality. This clean slate is supposedly necessary because it exists without the excess baggage of previous experiences, traditions, or morals. It is the state of complete openness, devoid of previous writing, and completely receptive. It is the ideal place to write the new personality. The rules for producing this clean slate, whether applied to a person or institution, are not based on morality or fairness, but on the premise that if a few eggs are broken in the process, there are always more to be had.

There is one major problem with the clean slate theory however, and that is, erasing the slate and making it completely clean has proven to be quite tricky – in fact, impossible. The only way that man has attempted to erase the slate is through destruction by some form of violence, and this destruction has not succeeded in wiping any slate clean, but has only resulted in a lot of broken pieces that will not be able to be put back together again; at least not by man.

Christianity, Corruption, and the Clean Slate Theory

The Federal government licenses churches as corporations. The things you need to start a Federally recognized church (7) are Articles of Incorporation, and a Federal Employer ID or F.E.I.N., Bylaws, and an IRS 501c3 Tax Exemption. To keep this tax-exempt status, the church corporation needs to play by Federal and state rules. If it doesn’t, its tax-exempt status can be revoked. This is a huge incentive to follow Federal and state mandates when it comes to church doctrine, rather than follow the actual words of the Bible. A church can have most any type of belief structure, and as long as it abides by Federal rules (8), it maintains is status.

This means that any Federally licensed religion is inherently corrupt because the rules of the Federal government, and state laws pre-empt Biblical laws. Therefore, even if you believe the Bible to be the Word of God, you had better make sure that you obey the laws of the land first and foremost, and place the Word of God in subordination to them, or lose your status. This is the corporate church.

Now, let’s look at organized religion in the form of Christianity. Christianity is also based on the “clean slate” theory. When one is “saved,” his/her slate is said to be “wiped clean.” There are church officials such as pastors, bishops, or priests that attempt to stand as mediators between the individual and his/her Creator, and profess the authority, which they do not have, to declare a person “saved,” or “born again” with a clean slate. If one reads the Bible in its entirety, he/she will discover that these so-called mediators not only have no divine authority to wipe a person’s slate clean, but have no clue as to how it is done. Only the Almighty Himself has that authority, or even knows what to do and how to do it. Therefore, any authority that these “mediators” assume they have in the area of salvation and wiping one’s slate clean is actually derived from the ordination they have received from the Federally licensed corporate church whose Articles of Incorporation they have pledged to uphold. Since the Federal and state laws trump Biblical law in these organizations, the corporate church’s ultimate authority stems from the Federal government and not the Almighty. Therefore, we have another case of man trying to create a clean slate on his own, and as we have seen previously, there is a major problem with the clean slate theory. Man cannot create a clean slate on his own. When he tries, he leaves a lot of broken pieces around that he cannot put back together.

Okay, let us say that a person receives a “born again” experience outside of church doctrine with no help from an “ordained minister” of the church. Even if the “born again” person has had an actual epiphany in spite of the pastor, bishop, or priest, he/she will still be the same person with the same faults as before the “born again” experience. Now the real work begins. The “truly saved” person will work on him/herself for the better, through a long process of self-reflection and prayer, and in time, the pieces of his/her life can be put together in a more perfect form with the help of the Almighty. It is not an instantaneous transformation, and the slate is not immediately wiped clean. A person must examine his/her life and determine what portions of it are acceptable and what portions are not. The things that are not acceptable are identified and a path is laid so that person can get rid of them if he/she wants to. Wiping the slate clean is a process that takes a lifetime, and cannot be done for you by a pastor, bishop, or priest.

However, if that person has not had an epiphany, then he/she has not been “truly saved,” and is either deceived and truly believes that one man has the power to “save” another and create a clean slate, and is in fact relying on church doctrine, which is subordinate to Federal and state law, for “salvation,” or he/she really knows something is amiss, but decides to just fake it in order to be accepted by the Church. Ultimately, what this person is left with is a bunch of broken pieces and no clue as to how to put them back together again.

Armageddon and the Clean Slate Theory

According to the Bible, Armageddon is the destruction that precipitates a clean slate for the new world – a new Jerusalem, in a Garden of Eden-type state.

The following quote is taken from Televangelist Jack Van Impe’s “Question of the Week” concerning Bush’s role in the end times battle of Armageddon, that appears in an article at http://www.rense.com/general31/arma.htm titled “Bush Primed By Evangelicals For Armageddon Scenario:

Question: “Do you think President Bush, a Christian man, believes or knows he’s involved with prophetic events concerning the Middle East and the final battle between good and evil?”

Answer: “First of all, Billy Graham led George W. Bush Jr. to the Lord Jesus Christ when he visited the White House. President Bush has attended many of Billy Graham’s crusades and during those crusades, Billy Graham always preaches once or twice on Christ’s return and all the prophetical signs…

So, yes, I think George W. knows that he’s destined for this final hour in prophetic history.”

If you have indeed received revelation and are truly in touch with the Almighty, then you will understand that He is in control, and it is not your duty to attempt to change the world. He is fully capable of doing that. It is your responsibility to work on changing yourself, do what is right, and thus become an example for others. However, if you are either faking it or believe that man can save man, and think your slate has actually been wiped clean because you have been “born again,” what is to stop you from believing that the whole world’s slate needs to be wiped clean, and it is your duty to participate in the world’s salvation? After all, if you believe that you have been instantaneously “reborn” through the efforts of a corrupt earthly mediator, why wouldn’t the same theory apply to the entire world? Conversion of the non-believer is a key concept in corporate religion, and church history tells us that if conversion is not voluntary, forced conversion will do. Therefore, attempting to force Armageddon on the world to convert it and create a clean slate so that it may be reborn as the New Jerusalem is not a far reach for loyal converts.

Corruption Begets Corruption

As we have discussed earlier, it is the Federal and state laws that are the ultimate authority in Federally licensed religions. And who owns the Federal government? The corporate elites. This is our corporate government. So, who creates the final doctrine for the Federally licensed Christian church? That’s right, the rich and powerful. And what do these people like to do? They like to create programs such as MK Ultra that focus on controlling the masses, and somehow I do not think the corporate church is exempt from this penchant for manipulation. In fact, the church is a very effective tool for controlling people.

So, if the rich and powerful create the doctrines for corporate religion in order to indoctrinate and control the masses, where do they believe their authority comes from? What if they actually believe that they have the divine right to rule based solely on their privileged status?

The Divine Right to Rule

Let’s discuss divine right. What if you believe that you are a child of God and therefore possess the divine, or God-given right to rule, and that is why you are so rich and powerful? What if you think that the ultimate sign of your worthiness to rule others is the wealth and power you have been “blessed” with? What if you believe that all of your sins have been washed clean, and you have become a new person instantly – no stirring required? What if you believe that in the name of your God, you can do no wrong? What if, in your arrogance brought about by excessive power and material wealth, and with your belief in divine right, you think it is your God-given duty to bring about a clean slate for the world through Armageddon, and expect a New World Order to rise out of the ashes of chaos? Your “New Jerusalem.” What if you have the position and power, and end up killing thousands upon thousands of people in the name of your God, while setting up your own version of the New Jerusalem, because you believe you have the divine right to do so, and/or are required to do so by the dictates of your religion? What if there are enough of you, with enough power and money, fueled by the same desire, to pull it off right under the noses of the common people, and actually glean their support? What if this New World Order is a horrible experiment that involves man acting as God?

If the elites are trying to create a man-made Armageddon in which to wipe the earth’s slate clean so that they can create their own “New Jerusalem” because they think it is their God-given duty, we are in for serious times ahead. As we have discussed earlier, by trying to wipe the slate clean, man just leaves piles of rubble around and has no clue how to put Humpty Dumpty back together again after the fall. The rich just glean the spoils from the rubble because they believe it is their God-given right to do so, and the rest of us try to survive while digging our way out of the rubbish or die. Those of us who do survive will need to learn some really good survival skills, and fast.

If by acting as Gods, and attempting to force a manufactured Armageddon on the world to create a clean slate for a New World Order, their version of the New Jerusalem, it would seem that these global elites are taking arrogance to a new level. If you believe in a religion of your own creation that by its very nature is corrupt, anything goes.

The Bottom Line

The bottom line is, we were not put here to control others. We are here to learn how to become better human beings. None of the corporate elites or their lackeys has the divine right to rule anyone. This includes G.W. Bush, the Rockefellers, Bill Gates, the Pope, the King of Saudi Arabia, the Shah of Iran, the government of Israel, Hamas, the Christian church, or any other person or organization that derives its life from the blood of others.

If you belong to any organization, including a corporate religion that takes its authority from the Federal government, then your organization is corrupt, and you had better start examining your conscience because anything goes. If you do not take a good, hard look at what you stand for and decide to stand up for what is right, and not what the Federal government or the corporate church tells you is right, then you’ve chosen the dark side and you just might end up becoming President!

What’s Next?

It is time for reflection, and devising a plan to become more self-sufficient by weaning ourselves off the corporate teat, whether that is corporate religion, corporate food, or anything else directed and owned by the corporate elite. If we are indeed at the beginning of a depression caused by these so-called “divinely appointed saviors” who are attempting to throw the world into chaos by a man-made Armageddon, then self-sufficiency and localization of food sources will become necessary to survive.

I believe that if we are to improve our circumstances, instead of bowing and scraping to the corporate elite who consider themselves divinely appointed to rule the rest of us, we need to start sharing information with others of like mind. This sharing will hopefully lead to a brighter future where people reach out to each other and form small communities in which food is grown locally, and trade is established between neighbors.

I have developed a blogsite devoted to this, which can be accessed at the following URL:

http://survivingthemiddleclasscrash.wordpress.com/

If you have anything to share, please do so. This site is for all of us. The time to prepare is now!

Copyright, 2008 Barbara H. Peterson

References:

1)      https://spktruth2power.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/in-bed-together/

2)      http://www.libertysecurity.org/article299.html

3)      http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB27/01-01.htm

4)      http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB27/02-01.htm

5)      http://www.hiddenmysteries.com/freebook/mk/index.html

6)      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKULTRA

7)      http://www.start-your-own-church.com/

8)      http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf

The Five Stages of Collapse by Dmitry Orlov

economic-collapse.jpg

Having given a lot of thought to both the differences and the similarities between the two superpowers – the one that has collapsed already [Russia], and the one that is collapsing as I write this [U.S.] – I feel ready to attempt a bold conjecture, and define five stages of collapse, to serve as mental milestones as we gauge our own collapse-preparedness and see what can be done to improve it. (Dmitry Orlov)

To read the entire article, click here: http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2008/02/five-stages-of-collapse.html

Barb

What do Bill Gates, the Rockefellers, and Oggie Dog have in common?

What do Bill Gates, the Rockefellers, and Oggie Dog have in common?

Answer: They are all aware that GMO frankenfood will kill you.

It all started with my dog Oggie eating a large quantity of sheep wool. Not just any sheep wool, but my endangered Jacob’s sheep wool. I thought this was rather strange, but took it in stride, and doused him with oil and fiber until the wool clump came out. I thought about what would entice him to eat this, since he has not done it before, but chalked it up to weird things dogs do after Marti found a missing hair curler in her dog Milo’s poop.

Now Oggie Dog has been raised on dry dog food, and he is over 10 years old. I have not had problems with this diet until about a year ago when he started getting finicky about the type of dry food he would eat. I attributed this to his age. After all, I am getting a bit finicky too, but that’s another story. Then it hit me after reading William Engdahl’s Seeds of Destruction. What if most of the dry dog food we get in the grocery store is made from GMO products? What if Oggie senses the GMO in his food and is rejecting it because he knows it is bad for him? What if he ate the wool because it was preferable to GMO dog food? Animals instinctively know what is good for them. Well, all except Marti’s dog Milo who will eat anything. But again, that’s another story. So, I started doing some research on the Net, and here is what I found:

Pet food recall linked to GMO
http://www.saynotogmos.org/ud2007/uapr07.php#recall

On March 23, [2007], the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets announced that rat poison in contaminated wheat gluten imported from China was responsible for the suffering and deaths of an as yet uncounted numbers of cats and dogs across North America. The poison is a chemical compound called aminopterin.

On March 30, [2007], the FDA reported finding a widely used compound called melamine in the suspect pet foods. The FDA claims the melamine was the cause of an as yet uncounted number of cat and dog poisonings and deaths. The FDA could not find the rat poison, aminopterin, in the samples it analyzed; however a lab in Canada, at the University of Guelph, has confirmed the presence of rat poison.

A brief internet search quickly reveals that the widely used insect growth regulator cryomazine is not only made from melamine, but it also breaks down into melamine after ingestion by an animal. Wheat gluten is wheat gluten, fit for human consumption, so the question remains, what was wrong with this gluten that it was only bought for use in pet food?

Dr. Michael W. Fox presents the following hypothesis:

1. The wheat gluten imported from China was not for human consumption, because, I believe, it had been genetically engineered.

2. The ‘rat poison’ aminopterin is used in molecular biology as an anti-metabolite, folate antagonist, and in genetic engineering biotechnology as a genetic marker. This could account for its presence in this imported wheat gluten.

3. The contaminant melamine, the parent chemical for a potent insecticide cyromazine, could well have been manufactured WITHIN the wheat plants themselves as a genetically engineered pesticide. This is much like the Bt. insecticidal poison present in most US commodity crops that go into animal feed.

4. So called ‘overexpression’ can occur when spliced genes that synthesize such chemicals become hyperactive inside the plant and result in potentially toxic plant tissues, lethal not just to meal worms and other crop pests, but to cats, dogs, birds, butterflies and other wildlife; and to their creators.

How else can one account for samples of pet food containing as much as 6% melamine? It was surely not mixed in such amounts when the wheat gluten was being processed, but rather was already in the wheat, along with the aminopterin genetic marker. My suspicion is that the FDA was aware that the gluten came from genetically engineered wheat that was considered safe for animal consumption.

In a nutshell, it is the researcher’s opinion that the recalled pet food contained GMO wheat gone bad. That is to say, a great deal of our pet food is normally made with GMO wheat imported from China. This particular batch went hyperactive and produced a toxic amount of genetically engineered poison in the wheat, and killed our pets.

Good boy, Oggie Dog! You sniffed out the GMO in your food and thumbed your nose at it. At least that is my theory. By the way, Here are some GMO testing results from Moscow that I don’t think the U.S. wants us to see:

Mouse tests and photos
http://www.saynotogmos.org/ud2007/uapr07.php

Maria Konovalova provided photos of the mice under tests:

rat1.jpg

A mouse from the control set [fed] on a common vivarium [controlled environment] ration

rat2.jpg

A mouse from the sample group that ate isolate of GM soy within five months

That Jacob’s sheep wool doesn’t look so bad, does it Oggie Dog? In fact, just about anything looks better than GMO dog food.  

Copyright 2008, Barbara H. Peterson

The PPJ Hero of the Month

People in positions of public trust that aren’t afraid to take a stand in defense of the rights of the people they serve deserve recognition, and a big THANK YOU! Therefore, we at the PPJ are proud to announce a new project called the PPJ Hero of the Month. If you know someone who deserves to be recognized, please let us know!

The PPJ Hero of the Month for March, 2008, is Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer for his courageous stand in rejecting the Real ID. If you have not heard him give Homeland Security a piece of his mind, here is the LINK.

Montana Governor

Brian Schweitzer

MT Gov Schweitzer

PPJ Hero of the Month

Quote: “Thanks for playing, Montana’s not in.” 

Thank you, Governor Schweitzer, for telling it like it is, and standing up for what is right. We the people salute you!

 PPJ – The Proud Political Junkie’s Gazette

http://ppjg.wordpress.com

Montana Says No Way to RealID

US ID The congress in Montana unanimously voted against RealID. Here’s their governor telling NPR that they will not listen to any of the DHS’s unconstitutional “hair-brained” schemes about national security, but “thanks for playing.”

http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=87991791&m=87991768

Take note of the empty threat by Homeland Security at the end. 

(Originally posted by Dave Henning at Freedom’s Phoenix.)

%d bloggers like this: