• Free subscription via e-mail!

  • Support the site!

  • Join me on Facebook!

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • October 2019
    S M T W T F S
    « Nov    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Top Posts

  • RSS Farm Wars

  • RSS SMCC

  • RSS The PPJ

  • Meta

FBI Targets Barbie Video Girl as Tool for Predators

By Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

Here is just another example of government gone bad:

‘Barbie Video Girl’ in FBI Crosshairs

A Barbie doll tricked out with a video camera concealed in her necklace could be used by predators to create child pornography, warns the FBI in a recent cybercrime alert. In the alert, mistakenly released to the press, the FBI expressed concern that the toy’s camera, which can capture 30 minutes of video and rivals a Canon 7D in quality, could be used to lure children and surreptitiously film child pornography. Barbie and other dolls have been used in the past by sexual predators to attract victims. (Media Monarchy)

What next? Maybe we should just outlaw all cameras, telephones, Barbie Dolls and anything else that people use. After all, anything could be used to “lure children.” Candy should definitely be outlawed and put on a potential cyber crime list of controlled items. Is anyone else getting sick to death of children being used in this manner to strip us of our rights?

FBI Special Agent Steve Dupre from the Sacremento Field Office, where the memo — dubbed a “Cyber Crime Alert” — originated, declined to comment.

Mattel, the manufacturer of the doll, said in a written statement that the FBI has not said that there have been any incidents of this doll “being used as anything other than intended.”

…But law enforcement sources close to the investigation into the doll tell ABC News that Barbie dolls have been known to be a used by sexual predators looking for ways to attract their young victims…. (ABC)

So beware, if you have a Barbie Doll, or candy, or ice cream, or anything else that might be used to “lure children,” you are next on the FBI list of suspects!  But the biggest culprit of all is not the Barbie Doll, it is the FBI! Yes, the FBI is on my list of child predators because they routinely exploit children in an ongoing insidious campaign designed to get people to comply with outrageous demands stemming from propaganda and fabricated “threats against children” to elicit our protective natures and use these natural instincts against us in a virulent manner, while tightening the control web of this police state we are living in.

Barbara H. Peterson

A news flash for the District of Criminals: It is 9/11 everday on our southern border

The PPJ Gazette

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All rights Reserved

____________________________

I have a news flash for you jackasses in the District of Criminals….WE ARE UNDER ATTACK!  It is 9/11 everyday on our southern border and for our citizens there.  What?  No NORTHCOM?  No Swat teams? No riot police?  No CIA? No FBI?  No drones?  No ADS systems or sonic weapons?  No tanks rolling through like they do in many of our major cities?  No satellite images to zero in on moving targets?  Where are you guys?  What?  Do you just save that stuff for those radical American citizens who protest the ever growing corporate government that has been steadily killing off our country for the last several decades?

We can send troops all over the world to defend other people (only if they have assets we want), to bring democracy to people who don’t want it (after all, look at the example we have set) and appear out of no where when an earthquake occurs on an island.  But we can’t defend America from an illegal invasion, or its citizens from an act of war coming from a neighboring country.  You don’t see any threat there?

Just so I understand everything correctly and to make sure I have it all right, here is the state of our country:  Continue reading

The Case of the Biodevastation 7: What the Police Won’t Apologize For:

Reprinted with permission of the author.

What the Police Won’t Apologize For

By DON FITZ

In early September, St. Louis police will send an apology for their illegal arrest of biodiversity activists.  Be assured that it will not mention their role in destroying public dialogue on dangers of genetically contaminated food. 

On August 24, 2009, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Eastern Missouri announced that the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners would pay $13,500 to each of four anti-genetic engineering activists for violating their first and fourth amendment rights and would apologize to them for police actions in May, 2003. [1]  That was when several hundred people gathered to protest the World Agricultural Forum [WAF] and hold the 7th Biodevastation Gathering to expose the racist use of genetic engineering in agriculture.

But the letter of apology is highly unlikely to address the most serious aspects of the repression.  Do not expect the letter to say anything about helping to consolidate control of world agriculture and throwing 1 billion people off of small farms.  Don’t look for the letter to mention the role of police in attempts to force genetically contaminated food on Africans with immuno-compromised health.  And don’t be surprised if the letter contains not a word about St. Louis police entering into a conspiracy with Monsanto, the FBI and corporate media to eliminate public discussion of the potential threats of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

St. Louis police were not stand-alone players.  As Daniel (digger) Romano wrote in the August 31 St. Louis Post-Dispatch “…Allied Intelligence [is] the private security agency hired by the WAF and its principle player, Monsanto, the biotech giant.  Allied Intelligence told police ‘50,000 anarchists’ were coming to St. Louis to riot and wreak havoc on the city.” [2]

The police apology will certainly misdirect attention onto its own illegal and repulsive behavior of May, 2003: warrantless entry into a home where a woman was subjected to “an unlawful and humiliating strip search,” a second warrantless entry under the false claim of the building being condemned, and arresting several activists for “riding a bicycle without a license,” a crime which did not exist. [1]

Under the FBI Eye

Preparations for the Biodevastation 7 Gathering started in 2002 when Jim Scheff, an organizer for the Missouri Forest Alliance, called to tell me that the WAF would be meeting in St. Louis the upcoming year.  He suggested that Biodevastation, which had been held in five cities after beginning in St. Louis in 1998, return to Monsanto’s home town so that people coming to WAF could hear a different view of biotechnology.

Documents obtained by the ACLU under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) show that the FBI was deeply involved in scrutinizing many documents that I wrote for the event, including emails from my computer.  The ACLU judged the FBI reports to be some “of the most troubling documents we received.” [3] Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: