By James P. Tucker, Jr.
Source: American Free Press
A veteran Air Force mechanic called to help clean up the Sept. 11, 2001 explosion at the Pentagon says the U.S. government’s blaming a plane for the damage makes no sense. The evidence was staged, he said.
He agreed to a face-to-face interview with AFP on condition he not be identified for obvious reasons: the Air Force would punish him severely (the same military harshness that gagged survivors of the 1967 USS Liberty attack for many years).
The airman, a tech sergeant, is richly experienced in hazardous waste cleanup, having been deployed twice to Afghanistan in the first Persian Gulf war under President Bush the Elder and, later, under George the Younger. He has 17 years of Air Force service.
The scene at the Pentagon “doesn’t look right,” the airman said. “There was only a piece of engine and sections of landing gear on the ground. It was like they were placed there. Where were the wings? Tail section? We expected to find a lot of debris but there was very little.”
There were “two massive engines” from planes that had, according to the government, penetrated the Pentagon “but the holes were too small” for that to be true, the airman said. The holes in the Pentagon were of the size made by Predators—the remote-controlled spy planes used in Iraq and Afghanistan—he said.
He indicated agreement with numerous construction experts interviewed by AFP who say the planes that struck the Twin Towers in New York could not have caused them to collapse as they did and bombs had to have been set off from inside.
Another oddity he noted was the story of young Israeli citizens, in this country illegally, who had set up a tripod camera on the roof of the warehouse where they worked and trained their camera on the Twin Towers shortly before the attacks. Witnesses told police the boys celebrated the attacks by joyfully jumping and slapping hands. Police held the men overnight and they were returned to Israel the next day. All this was reported in the mainstream media, but the story was immediately dropped. How did these Israelis know where to be and when to film the Trade Center disaster.
His “first instinct” is still with him. The airman told AMERICAN FREE PRESS: “We attacked ourselves to set up the invasion of Iraq.”
If true, this is the exact definition of treason, the penalty for which is death.
About the author:
AFP correspondent James P. Tucker Jr. is a veteran journalist who spent many years as a member of the “elite” media in Washington. Since 1975 he has won widespread recognition, here and abroad, for his pursuit of on-the-scene stories reporting the intrigues of global power blocs such as the Bilderberg Group.
Filed under: 9/11 | Tagged: 9-11, 9/11, evidence staged, fraud, inside job, pentagon
Your photo, which even Tucker didn’t try to pass off as proof that the hole was “too small,” was taken in the “C” ring of the Pentagon, well inside, and where only fragments of the disintegrated plane penetrated. This is obvious from the plane debris on the floor in the wall line and just beyond it. Predators don’t carry 757 parts, DNA matching 58 of the 59 victims aboard AA 77, both black boxes from AA 77, or enough jet fuel to start massive fires almost instantly on 5 floors, some of which were hot enough to boil water on the concrete surfaces above them. Predators look nothing like 757s, and no one near the Pentagon saw a Predator on 9/11, but ~105 eyewitnesses reported seeing a large airliner, many identified it as a Boeing 757, and some correctly reported which airline it was.
AA 77 was also tracked to that location by ATC, Airfone calls were made describing the events onboard, and American Airlines has paid out large sums of money to victims of the crash, and they don’t own Predators.
Thousands of local first responders, as well as Pentagon employees and investigators from the NTSB, FBI, and American Airlines saw the wreckage of AA 77 inside. There’s a comprehensive list of agencies, along with real information on the crash, at this link:
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/911pentagonflight77evidencesummary
Unlike Tucker’s alleged Air Force vet, most of these thousands of people exist and are available for comment. I have links to most of the agencies listed, if you’d like to start contacting them.
Next you’re going to tell me you believe that steel reinforced buildings can disintigrate into a cloud of dust and fall into their footprints at near free-fall speed after having sustained only minor damage from falling debris. If you believe that, I have some ocean-front property in Texas that I’d like you to see.
Please read NCSTAR 1A before making such patently absurd statements, Barbara. The hi-rise you’re referring to was steel-framed, not steel-reinforced, and the collapse, which occurred in the midst of major, uncontrolled fires which had been burning for nearly seven hours, is clearly explained there. What you cannot explain is how a controlled demolition could have occurred without numerous loud explosions immediately preceding it, and without leaving copious amounts of unmistakable evidence in the debris. There is not one legitimate report of either.
Absolutely correct Ms Barbara. And “albury” gets it all wrong once again because of a lack of basic physics. As it turns out, there is video evidence of explosions which, at the distances involved, would not have been all that loud, and considering all the ambient noise in the area, would probably have gone unnoticed.
And then there is that other nasty little detail about the “molten steel” in the basement of the tower wreckage that was found some FIVE WEEKS after 9/11. Again, anyone with a little HS physics or chemistry could figure out pretty quickly that a little jet fuel in a “cold burn” could not have generated enough heat to melt steel much less create a molten pool of the stuff that would persist for weeks. However, Thermate CAN do that. Thermate is the stuff that is used to bring down buildings in a controlled demolition.
Agreed that the photo was of the inner ring however, if you look at the photos of the point of entry, it is a round hole, no marks where the wings or tail should have cut into the building. If you subscribe to the idea that the wings folded back and the tail folded down (which is rather absurd), they you are still left with the problem of how the entire plane and its contents disintegrate without a trace. Any person with some HS physics could figure out there there is simply not enough energy involved in such a crash to vaporize everything – keep in mind that many parts in the engine are titanium which has a melting point much higher than the burning temp of the jet fuel – boiling water is simple compared to vaporizing aluminum, steel, titanium, …etc. And those black boxes? They are designed to survive plane fires. And then there is that nasty detail about the absence of any video that shows an actual 757 hitting one of the worlds most secure buildings? All the other silliness you talk about (witnesses, phone calls, …etc. are too easily fakes/staged. The fragments that were in the Pentagon, if you look closely, are too small to be from a 757 – sorry – you lost that argument too. So, go back to HS, study some physics and critical thinking, and then we can have some intelligent discourse.
Ms. Barbara Peterson – right on girl!
The very comprehensive data put forward by Albury’s sources also placed on record the fact that the hijack pilots, whose passport somehow came flying out of the aircraft window as it stuck, were rookies and a 757 flyer training manual was found in their car. Cameras on the nearby road recorded the aircraft flying past before hitting the Pentagon. Why don’t they just show that film and this controversy will be solved?
So much for factual reporting.
Which hijack pilot’s passport “came flying out of a window”? One was recovered on the pavement in NYC, along with thousands of other combustible articles from the plane, but it was not a pilot’s. It also had little to no evidentiary value.
Watching a video on youtube that surfaced, indicated that someone was taking a video at a starting point prior to the incident. What is interesting to note is that as you watch the manner in which the towers went down, did indictate the possibility of explosives within the building. The fall down was too precise, as the work of a professional demolishion expert. The youtube video that surfaced indeed cause anyone to conclude that such monstrosity was well orchestrated. It was the work of many who indeed show hatred for America and Americans. Each day every bit of drama continues to unfold the reality that America has too many enemies within. England is faced with similar problems. It was disgusting to see the so-called ‘peaceful demonstrations of middle eastern individuals expressing with hateful posters their self granted authority, their demands and how they pland to take England and then the rest!. Some people are outrageous! They are given courtesies and try to throw the owner of the house out! The sad thing is that England to some degree is allowing it and Americans are allowing it also. Americans have got to wake up and stand up to the representatives and vote out those who are only serving themselves and not serving America! Stop being sheep walking towards the will of the wolves!
I get so sick of disinformation agents. 911 was an inside job. Plain and simple. Why bother to argue with someone who will never see that or is paid not to? I have spent a huge amount of time investigating it and the evidence for an inside job is irrefutable and very plentiful.
Don’t even waste your time on skeptics anymore because if they haven’t figured it out on their own by now they simply never will.
Here is a great magazine with lots of good stuff on 9/11
http://www.republicmagazine.com/magazines/issue16/pdf/Republic-Magazine16.pdf
Must Visit 9/11 Site:
http://www.ae911truth.org/
It all looks like ‘Wag the Dog’ story.
Just G.W. ‘Old Shoe’ Bush saved the world.